Description
In the late ninth century, Asser famously wrote that the West Saxons did not permit a king’s consort to take the title of queen or assume status equal to the king. Yet, a century later, in 973, a West Saxon queen-consort, Ælfthryth (d. c.1000), would be publicly anointed as queen as a part of the elaborate pageantry associated with the second coronation of her husband, Edgar the Peaceful (d.975). Both Asser’s statement and Ælfthryth’s coronation respond to specific events and political environments, but do these contexts isolate one from the other? Or should English queenship in the tenth century be viewed as a continuum whereby incremental changes to authority, prerogatives and status eventuate in an ‘office’ of queen? This is the question this paper seeks to answer. Through the examination of charters, wills and chronicles, it will explore the evolution of queenship through the tenth century and evaluate the evidence for queens’ increasing political engagement and agency. It will, however, also question whether these are trends specific to those who acquired queenly status, or whether they can be more broadly observed among royal and noble women.Period | 31 Jul 2023 |
---|---|
Event title | Status, Rank, or Office? Social Boundaries in England c. 900-1200 |
Event type | Conference |
Location | Durham, United KingdomShow on map |
Degree of Recognition | International |
Related content
-
Research Outputs
-
Identifying Queenship in Pre-Conquest England
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
-
Early English Queens, 850–1000: Potestas Reginae
Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review