Abstract
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is heavily criticized for being one of the major contributors to the causes of the Ebola outbreak in Africa. This study examined whether public health spending in Ebola affected Sub-Saharan African countries (SSACs) were more likely to decrease compared to non-Ebola affected countries due to IMF bailout program participation. A regression model and its robustness were used to analyse SSACs data from 1994 to 2014. The empirical findings of this study show that IMF bailout can significantly increase the health expenditure of non-Ebola-affected SSACs. But we obtained a significantly negative relationship between health spending and IMF program participation for Ebola-affected SSACs. The study has implications for the methodological design of studies addressing this debatable issue and health spending policy in SSACs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 568-589 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Policy Modeling |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals
Keywords
- Ebola
- IMF bailouts
- Public health sector
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of IMF bailouts on African recipient country health systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver