TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of two methods for estimating 50% of the maximal motor evoked potential
AU - Pitcher, Julia
AU - Doeltgen, Sebastian
AU - Goldsworthy, Mitchell
AU - Schneider, Luke
AU - Vallence, Ann-Maree
AU - Smith, Ashleigh
AU - Semmler, John
AU - McDonnell, Michelle
AU - Ridding, Michael
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - Objectives: Two commonly-used methods for setting stimulus intensities in transcranial magnetic brain stimulation studies were compared to determine which best approximated a motor evoked potential (MEP) of 50% of the maximal MEP amplitude (SI50); a suprathreshold intensity relative to resting motor threshold (rMT) or adjusting the intensity to evoke an MEP amplitude of 1mV. Methods: Corticomotor stimulus-response curves and rMT for the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of 176 subjects (aged 10-74. years) were retrospectively analysed. Results: Regardless of subject age or sex, SI50 occurred at 127.5±11.3% rMT. Except in young children, MEPs of 1mV were significantly smaller than those evoked at SI50. Conclusions: In the inactive FDI muscle, a stimulus intensity of 127-128% rMT consistently gives the best approximation of SI50 in most subjects, except perhaps young children. Significance: Setting TMS stimulus intensities relative to rMT provides a less variable inter-subject comparator, with respect to individual differences in corticomotor input-output characteristics, than adjusting the stimulator output to give an absolute MEP magnitude.
AB - Objectives: Two commonly-used methods for setting stimulus intensities in transcranial magnetic brain stimulation studies were compared to determine which best approximated a motor evoked potential (MEP) of 50% of the maximal MEP amplitude (SI50); a suprathreshold intensity relative to resting motor threshold (rMT) or adjusting the intensity to evoke an MEP amplitude of 1mV. Methods: Corticomotor stimulus-response curves and rMT for the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of 176 subjects (aged 10-74. years) were retrospectively analysed. Results: Regardless of subject age or sex, SI50 occurred at 127.5±11.3% rMT. Except in young children, MEPs of 1mV were significantly smaller than those evoked at SI50. Conclusions: In the inactive FDI muscle, a stimulus intensity of 127-128% rMT consistently gives the best approximation of SI50 in most subjects, except perhaps young children. Significance: Setting TMS stimulus intensities relative to rMT provides a less variable inter-subject comparator, with respect to individual differences in corticomotor input-output characteristics, than adjusting the stimulator output to give an absolute MEP magnitude.
KW - Ageing
KW - Children
KW - Corticomotor stimulus-response curves
KW - First dorsal interosseous
KW - Motor evoked potential
KW - Resting motor threshold
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948720726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011
DO - 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.011
M3 - Article
SN - 1388-2457
VL - 126
SP - 2337
EP - 2341
JO - Clinical Neurophysiology
JF - Clinical Neurophysiology
IS - 12
ER -