A further methodologic comment on Recalcati et al's response on the “skull with petrified ears” on the necessity of evidence-based anthropologic studies

Francesco M. Galassi, Elena Varotto, Veronica Papa

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

We would like to thank Recalcati et al for their response by stressing that we very much welcome the contributions to anthropology and paleopathology that may arise from the field of clinical medicine, including dermatology. It is not our intention to promote a separation between areas of knowledge (suffice it to say that one of us, F.M.G., is a physician by training); on the contrary, we wish to promote the integration of different approaches toward the establishment of a problem-solving strategy capable of identifying diseases in the past.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-426
Number of pages2
JournalClinics in Dermatology
Volume41
Issue number3
Early online date23 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2023

Keywords

  • Paleopathology
  • Petrified ears
  • auricular ossification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A further methodologic comment on Recalcati et al's response on the “skull with petrified ears” on the necessity of evidence-based anthropologic studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this