A guide to reading and using systematic reviews of qualitative research

Allison Tong, Suetonia Palmer, Jonathan Craig, Giovanni Strippoli

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)


There is an increasingly widespread policy momentum to increase patient-centred care and to improve quality of life outcomes within health services. Qualitative research methods are used to elicit in-depth and detailed insights into people's attitudes, beliefs, emotions and experiences - much of which may remain unspoken during clinical encounters. Questions about patients' beliefs and preferences for treatment can be addressed by qualitative research and inform evidence-based strategies for delivering patient-centred care. Systematic reviews of multiple primary qualitative studies bring together findings from different studies to offer new and more comprehensive understandings of social phenomena across various healthcare contexts and populations and are an emerging methodology in the literature including for care in chronic kidney disease. This article will provide a framework for the systematic review of qualitative research so readers can make sense of these study types and use them in clinical care and policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)897-903
Number of pages7
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2016


  • thematic synthesis


Dive into the research topics of 'A guide to reading and using systematic reviews of qualitative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this