A qualitative study on trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education

Marja Dijksterhuis, Lambertus Schuwirth, Didi Braat, Pim Teunissen, Fedde Scheele

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Introduction: Recent changes in postgraduate medical training curricula usually encompass a shift towards more formative assessment, or assessment for learning. However, though theoretically well suited to postgraduate training, evidence is emerging that engaging in formative assessment in daily clinical practice is complex. Aim: We aimed to explore trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of what factors determine active engagement in formative assessment. Methods: Focus group study with postgraduate trainees and supervisors in obstetrics and gynaecology. Results: Three higher order themes emerged: individual perspectives on feedback, supportiveness of the learning environment and the credibility of feedback and/or feedback giver. Conclusion: Engaging in formative assessment with a genuine impact on learning is complex and quite a challenge to both trainees and supervisors. Individual perspectives on feedback, a supportive learning environment and credibility of feedback are all important in this process. Every one of these should be taken into account when the utility of formative assessment in postgraduate medical training is evaluated.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)e1396-e1402
    Number of pages7
    JournalMedical Teacher
    Volume35
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A qualitative study on trainees' and supervisors' perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this