A Reflective Practitioner Case Study Approach to Researching Verbatim Theatre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The Reflective Practitioner Case Study (RPCS) methodology, as defined by John O’Toole in Doing Drama Research (2006), is situated within the broader category of qualitative practice-led research, with a focus on inducing practice based data for analysis and research. This article details my application of the RPCS methodology when researching the process and impact of verbatim theatre practice within the context of writing and performing the verbatim play bald heads & blue stars. I provide examples of the triangulated documentation of the creative process, demonstrate strategic planning for the induction of data in order to research the values that influence practice, and the approach used to explore the impact that being involved in a verbatim theatre process has on the interview subjects. While elsewhere I have published the findings of my research into the verbatim theatre process, values and impact of the bald heads & blue stars project, this article focuses specifically on the strategic implementation of various RPCS methods, such as interviewing, critically reflective journals (both written and audio recorded) and the archiving of external and integral materials related to the practice of writing and performing a verbatim play. This article systematically outlines the comprehensive and triangulated approach for inducing data and documenting a creative project when conducting practice-led research using a Reflective Practitioner Case Study.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10
Pages (from-to)3336-3349
Number of pages14
JournalThe Qualitative Report
Volume25
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Practice-led research
  • verbatim theatre
  • case study
  • Reflective practice

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Reflective Practitioner Case Study Approach to Researching Verbatim Theatre'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this