TY - JOUR
T1 - A return-on-investment approach for prioritization of rigorous taxonomic research needed to inform responses to the biodiversity crisis
AU - Melville, Jane
AU - Chapple, David G.
AU - Scott Keogh, J.
AU - Sumner, Joanna
AU - Amey, Andrew
AU - Bowles, Phil
AU - Brennan, Ian G.
AU - Couper, Patrick
AU - Donnellan, Stephen C.
AU - Doughty, Paul
AU - Edwards, Danielle L.
AU - Ellis, Ryan J.
AU - Esquerré, Damien
AU - Fenker, Jéssica
AU - Gardner, Michael G.
AU - Georges, Arthur
AU - Haines, Margaret L.
AU - Hoskin, Conrad J.
AU - Hutchinson, Mark
AU - Moritz, Craig
AU - Nankivell, James
AU - Oliver, Paul
AU - Pavón-Vázquez, Carlos J.
AU - Pepper, Mitzy
AU - Rabosky, Daniel L.
AU - Sanders, Kate
AU - Shea, Glenn
AU - Singhal, Sonal
AU - Wilmer, Jessica Worthington
AU - Tingley, Reid
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Global biodiversity loss is a profound consequence of human activity. Disturbingly, biodiversity loss is greater than realized because of the unknown number of undocumented species. Conservation fundamentally relies on taxonomic recognition of species, but only a fraction of biodiversity is described. Here, we provide a new quantitative approach for prioritizing rigorous taxonomic research for conservation. We implement this approach in a highly diverse vertebrate group—Australian lizards and snakes. Of 870 species assessed, we identified 282 (32.4%) with taxonomic uncertainty, of which 17.6% likely comprise undescribed species of conservation concern. We identify 24 species in need of immediate taxonomic attention to facilitate conservation. Using a broadly applicable return-on-investment framework, we demonstrate the importance of prioritizing the fundamental work of identifying species before they are lost.
AB - Global biodiversity loss is a profound consequence of human activity. Disturbingly, biodiversity loss is greater than realized because of the unknown number of undocumented species. Conservation fundamentally relies on taxonomic recognition of species, but only a fraction of biodiversity is described. Here, we provide a new quantitative approach for prioritizing rigorous taxonomic research for conservation. We implement this approach in a highly diverse vertebrate group—Australian lizards and snakes. Of 870 species assessed, we identified 282 (32.4%) with taxonomic uncertainty, of which 17.6% likely comprise undescribed species of conservation concern. We identify 24 species in need of immediate taxonomic attention to facilitate conservation. Using a broadly applicable return-on-investment framework, we demonstrate the importance of prioritizing the fundamental work of identifying species before they are lost.
KW - Global biodiversity loss
KW - Australian Society of Herpetologists
KW - International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List
KW - IUCN Red List
KW - taxonomic recognition of species
KW - taxonomic uncertainty
KW - undescribed species of conservation concern
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107224298&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001210
DO - 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001210
M3 - Article
C2 - 34061821
AN - SCOPUS:85107224298
SN - 1544-9173
VL - 19
JO - PLOS Biology
JF - PLOS Biology
IS - 6
M1 - e3001210
ER -