A review of Regulations Applicable to Human Germline Cell Editing in Australia and around the World

Melissa de Zwart, Claudia Floreani

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article argues that it is time for a more comprehensive review of Australian law relating to human germline cell genetic engineering. We do not aim to take an ethical stance. Rather, we argue that broader reform and review are necessary in order to come to a suitable ethical stance, and for legislation to reflect that ethical stance adequately rather than inhabiting the corridors of vagary. The need for this has arisen gradually over the past decade, as around the world more countries are developing their capabilities in this field. As such, regulation is of increasing importance either to facilitate further research, or adequately block inappropriate research. Australia's current regulation in comparison contains uncertainty and lacks conviction. We argue that in order to ensure this area is governed primarily by what is in the public interest a review is in order.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-609
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
Volume29
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2022

Keywords

  • genetic engineering
  • gene editing germ cell editing
  • bioethics
  • scientific regulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of Regulations Applicable to Human Germline Cell Editing in Australia and around the World'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this