TY - JOUR
T1 - A strife of interests
T2 - A qualitative study on the challenges facing oral health workforce policy and planning
AU - Balasubramanian, Madhan
AU - Brennan, David S.
AU - Short, Stephanie D.
AU - Gallagher, Jennifer E.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Oral health workforce policy has often lacked systematic connections with broader health policy, and system-based reforms that would enable more effective responses to future needs of the population. The aim of the study was to better understand challenges facing oral health workforce policy and planning and identify potential solutions. In-depth interviews of 23 senior oral health leaders and/or health policy experts from 15 countries were conducted in 2016-17. Grounded theory principles using the Straussian school of thought guided the qualitative analysis. The findings identified: (i) narrow approach towards dental education, (ii) imbalances in skills, jobs and competencies, and (iii) geographic maldistribution as major challenges. An overarching theme -“strife of interests” - shed light on the tension between the profession's interest, and the needs of the population. A key aspect was the clash for power, dominance and authority within the oral health workforce and across health professions. This study argues that appreciating the history of health professions and recognising the centrality of the strife of interests is necessary in developing policies that both address professional sensitivities and are in line with the needs of the population. Integration and closer collaboration of oral health professionals with the mainstream medical and health professions has emerged as the key issue, but the solutions will be diverse and dependent on country- or context-specific scenarios.
AB - Oral health workforce policy has often lacked systematic connections with broader health policy, and system-based reforms that would enable more effective responses to future needs of the population. The aim of the study was to better understand challenges facing oral health workforce policy and planning and identify potential solutions. In-depth interviews of 23 senior oral health leaders and/or health policy experts from 15 countries were conducted in 2016-17. Grounded theory principles using the Straussian school of thought guided the qualitative analysis. The findings identified: (i) narrow approach towards dental education, (ii) imbalances in skills, jobs and competencies, and (iii) geographic maldistribution as major challenges. An overarching theme -“strife of interests” - shed light on the tension between the profession's interest, and the needs of the population. A key aspect was the clash for power, dominance and authority within the oral health workforce and across health professions. This study argues that appreciating the history of health professions and recognising the centrality of the strife of interests is necessary in developing policies that both address professional sensitivities and are in line with the needs of the population. Integration and closer collaboration of oral health professionals with the mainstream medical and health professions has emerged as the key issue, but the solutions will be diverse and dependent on country- or context-specific scenarios.
KW - Health professions
KW - Health workforce
KW - Integrated care
KW - Interprofessional colloboration
KW - Medical-dental divide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069868947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/GNT1121576
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/GNT1031310
U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 31362833
AN - SCOPUS:85069868947
SN - 0168-8510
VL - 123
SP - 1068
EP - 1075
JO - Health Policy
JF - Health Policy
IS - 11
ER -