A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults

Candice Oster; Sonia Hines; Chris Rissel; Dennis Asante; Jyoti Khadka; Katrin M. Seeher; Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan  Jotheeswaran; Christopher Mikton; Theresa Diaz; Vivian Isaac

doi:10.1093/ageing/afad100

A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults

Candice Oster, Sonia Hines, Chris Rissel, Dennis Asante, Jyoti Khadka, Katrin M. Seeher, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan Jotheeswaran, Christopher Mikton, Theresa Diaz, Vivian Isaac

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to examine the measurement properties of instruments that have been used to measure aspects of psychological capacity in adults aged 60 years and over. METHODS: the databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMCARE and Scopus from 2010 were searched using search terms related to psychological capacity, older persons and measurement properties. Both data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) criteria using Covidence software. RESULTS: the full text of 326 articles were reviewed and a total of 30 studies were included, plus two further articles identified from reference lists (n = 32). No single instrument measuring psychological capacity was identified. Twenty (n = 20) instruments were identified that measure seven constructs of psychological capacity: Resilience; Sense of coherence; Hope; Mindfulness; Optimism; Attachment to life; Emotional regulation. CONCLUSIONS: this systematic review identified potential measures of psychological capacity in older adults. The review will inform further work to develop a single comprehensive measure of psychological capacity in older adults.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	iv67-iv81
Number of pages	15
Journal	Age and Ageing
Volume	52
Issue number	Supplement_4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad100
Publication status	Published - Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© World Health Organization, 2023. All rights reserved. The World Health Organization has granted the Publisher permission for the reproduction of this article.

Keywords

healthy ageing
intrinsic capacity
older people
psychological capacity
psychometric property
systematic review

Access to Document

10.1093/ageing/afad100Licence: CC BY

Published versionFinal published version, 696 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{be30cf2f938948a58f18d94e7a9c96e6,

title = "A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: to examine the measurement properties of instruments that have been used to measure aspects of psychological capacity in adults aged 60 years and over. METHODS: the databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMCARE and Scopus from 2010 were searched using search terms related to psychological capacity, older persons and measurement properties. Both data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) criteria using Covidence software. RESULTS: the full text of 326 articles were reviewed and a total of 30 studies were included, plus two further articles identified from reference lists (n = 32). No single instrument measuring psychological capacity was identified. Twenty (n = 20) instruments were identified that measure seven constructs of psychological capacity: Resilience; Sense of coherence; Hope; Mindfulness; Optimism; Attachment to life; Emotional regulation. CONCLUSIONS: this systematic review identified potential measures of psychological capacity in older adults. The review will inform further work to develop a single comprehensive measure of psychological capacity in older adults.",

keywords = "healthy ageing, intrinsic capacity, older people, psychological capacity, psychometric property, systematic review",

author = "Candice Oster and Sonia Hines and Chris Rissel and Dennis Asante and Jyoti Khadka and Seeher, {Katrin M.} and Jotheeswaran, {Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan} and Christopher Mikton and Theresa Diaz and Vivian Isaac",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} World Health Organization, 2023. All rights reserved. The World Health Organization has granted the Publisher permission for the reproduction of this article.",

year = "2023",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1093/ageing/afad100",

language = "English",

volume = "52",

pages = "iv67--iv81",

journal = "Age and Ageing",

issn = "0002-0729",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "Supplement_4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults

AU - Oster, Candice

AU - Hines, Sonia

AU - Rissel, Chris

AU - Asante, Dennis

AU - Khadka, Jyoti

AU - Seeher, Katrin M.

AU - Jotheeswaran, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan

AU - Mikton, Christopher

AU - Diaz, Theresa

AU - Isaac, Vivian

PY - 2023/10

Y1 - 2023/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: to examine the measurement properties of instruments that have been used to measure aspects of psychological capacity in adults aged 60 years and over. METHODS: the databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMCARE and Scopus from 2010 were searched using search terms related to psychological capacity, older persons and measurement properties. Both data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) criteria using Covidence software. RESULTS: the full text of 326 articles were reviewed and a total of 30 studies were included, plus two further articles identified from reference lists (n = 32). No single instrument measuring psychological capacity was identified. Twenty (n = 20) instruments were identified that measure seven constructs of psychological capacity: Resilience; Sense of coherence; Hope; Mindfulness; Optimism; Attachment to life; Emotional regulation. CONCLUSIONS: this systematic review identified potential measures of psychological capacity in older adults. The review will inform further work to develop a single comprehensive measure of psychological capacity in older adults.

AB - OBJECTIVE: to examine the measurement properties of instruments that have been used to measure aspects of psychological capacity in adults aged 60 years and over. METHODS: the databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMCARE and Scopus from 2010 were searched using search terms related to psychological capacity, older persons and measurement properties. Both data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) criteria using Covidence software. RESULTS: the full text of 326 articles were reviewed and a total of 30 studies were included, plus two further articles identified from reference lists (n = 32). No single instrument measuring psychological capacity was identified. Twenty (n = 20) instruments were identified that measure seven constructs of psychological capacity: Resilience; Sense of coherence; Hope; Mindfulness; Optimism; Attachment to life; Emotional regulation. CONCLUSIONS: this systematic review identified potential measures of psychological capacity in older adults. The review will inform further work to develop a single comprehensive measure of psychological capacity in older adults.

KW - healthy ageing

KW - intrinsic capacity

KW - older people

KW - psychological capacity

KW - psychometric property

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175404421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ageing/afad100

DO - 10.1093/ageing/afad100

M3 - Article

C2 - 37902524

AN - SCOPUS:85175404421

SN - 0002-0729

VL - 52

SP - iv67-iv81

JO - Age and Ageing

JF - Age and Ageing

IS - Supplement_4

ER -

A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this