TY - JOUR
T1 - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing
T2 - A comprehensive literature review
AU - Butler, Tamara L.
AU - Anderson, Kate
AU - Garvey, Gail
AU - Cunningham, Joan
AU - Ratcliffe, Julie
AU - Tong, Allison
AU - Whop, Lisa J.
AU - Cass, Alan
AU - Dickson, Michelle
AU - Howard, Kirsten
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.
AB - There are significant health and social disparities between the world's Indigenous and non-Indigenous people on factors likely to influence quality of life (QOL) and wellbeing. However, these disparities in wellbeing are not captured in conventional QOL instruments, as they often do not include dimensions that are likely to be relevant to Indigenous people. The objective of this comprehensive literature review was to identify these wellbeing domains for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia (hereafter, respectfully referred to collectively as Indigenous Australians). We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Econlit, CINAHL, and Embase (from inception to June 2017, and updated in March 2019), and grey literature sources using keywords relating to adult Indigenous Australians' QOL and wellbeing. From 278 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 95 were included in a thematic analysis. This synthesis revealed nine broad interconnected wellbeing dimensions: autonomy, empowerment and recognition; family and community; culture, spirituality and identity; Country; basic needs; work, roles and responsibilities; education; physical health; and mental health. The findings suggest domains of wellbeing relevant to and valued by Indigenous Australians that may not be included in existing QOL and wellbeing instruments, domains that may be shared with Indigenous populations globally. This indicates the need for a tailored wellbeing instrument that includes factors relevant to Indigenous Australians. Developing such an instrument will ensure meaningful, culturally-relevant measurement of Indigenous Australians' wellbeing.
KW - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
KW - Australian
KW - Comprehensive literature review
KW - Domains
KW - First Nations
KW - Indigenous Australians
KW - Quality of life
KW - Wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067086717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1125434
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1041111
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1058244
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1105399
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1142035
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1106716
U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004
DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.06.004
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31200269
AN - SCOPUS:85067086717
SN - 0277-9536
VL - 233
SP - 138
EP - 157
JO - Social Science and Medicine
JF - Social Science and Medicine
ER -