TY - JOUR
T1 - Adaptation of public health initiatives
T2 - expert views on current guidance and opportunities to advance their application and benefit
AU - Yoong, Sze Lin
AU - Bolsewicz, Katarzyna
AU - Grady, Alice
AU - Wyse, Rebecca
AU - Sutherland, Rachel
AU - Hodder, Rebecca Kate
AU - Kingsland, Melanie
AU - Nathan, Nicole
AU - McCrabb, Sam
AU - Bauman, Adrian
AU - Wiggers, John
AU - Moullin, Joanna
AU - Albers, Bianca
AU - Fernandez, Maria E.
AU - Hall, Alix
AU - Sims-Gould, Joanie
AU - Taylor, Natalie
AU - Rissel, Chris
AU - Milat, Andrew
AU - Bailey, Andrew
AU - Batchelor, Samantha
AU - Attia, John
AU - Wolfenden, Luke
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - While there is some guidance to support the adaptation of evidence-based public health interventions, little is known about adaptation in practice and how to best support public health practitioners in its operationalization. This qualitative study was undertaken with researchers, methodologists, policy makers and practitioners representing public health expert organizations and universities internationally to explore their views on available adaptation frameworks, elicit potential improvements to such guidance, and identify opportunities to improve implementation of public health initiatives. Participants attended a face to face workshop in Newcastle, Australia in October 2018 where World Café and focus group discussions using Appreciative Inquiry were undertaken. A number of limitations with current guidance were reported, including a lack of detail on 'how' to adapt, limited information on adaptation of implementation strategies and a number of structural issues related to the wording and ordering of elements within frameworks. A number of opportunities to advance the field was identified. Finally, a list of overarching principles that could be applied together with existing frameworks was generated and suggested to provide a practical way of supporting adaptation decisions in practice.
AB - While there is some guidance to support the adaptation of evidence-based public health interventions, little is known about adaptation in practice and how to best support public health practitioners in its operationalization. This qualitative study was undertaken with researchers, methodologists, policy makers and practitioners representing public health expert organizations and universities internationally to explore their views on available adaptation frameworks, elicit potential improvements to such guidance, and identify opportunities to improve implementation of public health initiatives. Participants attended a face to face workshop in Newcastle, Australia in October 2018 where World Café and focus group discussions using Appreciative Inquiry were undertaken. A number of limitations with current guidance were reported, including a lack of detail on 'how' to adapt, limited information on adaptation of implementation strategies and a number of structural issues related to the wording and ordering of elements within frameworks. A number of opportunities to advance the field was identified. Finally, a list of overarching principles that could be applied together with existing frameworks was generated and suggested to provide a practical way of supporting adaptation decisions in practice.
KW - public health initiative
KW - evidence-based healthcare
KW - public health practitioners
KW - qualitative studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088607623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/DE170100382
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1150476
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1132450
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1128348
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1150661
U2 - 10.1093/her/cyaa014
DO - 10.1093/her/cyaa014
M3 - Article
C2 - 32632449
AN - SCOPUS:85088607623
SN - 0268-1153
VL - 35
SP - 243
EP - 257
JO - Health education research
JF - Health education research
IS - 4
ER -