Abstract
A body of research in conversation analysis has identified a range of structurally-provided positions in which sources of trouble in talk-in-interaction can be addressed using repair. These practices are contained within what . Schegloff (1992) calls the repair space. In this paper, I examine a rare instance in which a source of trouble is not resolved within the repair space and comes to be addressed outside of it. The practice by which this occurs is a post-completion account; that is, an account that is produced after the possible completion of the sequence containing a source of trouble. Unlike fourth position repair, the final repair position available within the repair space, this account is not made in preparation for a revised response to the trouble-source turn. Its more restrictive aim, rather, is to circumvent an ongoing difference between the parties involved. I argue that because the trouble is addressed in this manner, and in this particular position, the repair space can be considered as being limited to the sequence in which a source of trouble originates.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 374-386 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Conversation analysis
- Intersubjectivity
- Post-completion account
- Repair
- Repair space
- Talk-in-interaction