Addressing social determinants of health inequities through settings: a rapid review

Lareen Newman, Frances Baum, Sara Javanparast, Leanne Carlon, Peter O'Rourke

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    81 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Changing settings to be more supportive of health and healthy choices is an optimum way to improve population health and health equity. This article uses the World Health Organisation's (1998) (WHO Health Promotion Glossary. WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW) definition of settings approaches to health promotion as those focused on modifying settings' structure and nature. A rapid literature review was undertaken in the period June-August 2014, combining a systematically conducted search of two major databases with targeted searches. The review focused on identifying what works in settings approaches to address the social determinants of health inequities, using Fair Foundations: the VicHealth framework for health equity. This depicts the social determinants of health inequities as three layers of influence, and entry points for action to promote health equity. The evidence review identified work in 12 settings (cities; communities and neighbourhoods; educational; healthcare; online; faith-based; sports; workplaces; prisons; and nightlife, green and temporary settings), and work at the socioeconomic, political and cultural context layer of the Fair Foundations framework (governance, legislation, regulation and policy). It located a relatively small amount of evidence that settings themselves are being changed in ways which address the social determinants of health inequities. Rather, many initiatives focus on individual behaviour change within settings. There is considerable potential for health promotion professionals to focus settings work more upstream and so replace or integrate individual approaches with those addressing daily living conditions and higher level structures, and a significant need for programmes to be evaluated for differential equity impacts and published to provide a more solid evidence base.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)ii126-ii143
    Number of pages17
    JournalHealth Promotion International
    Volume30
    Issue numberSuppl_2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 Sept 2015

    Keywords

    • equity
    • review
    • settings
    • social determinants

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing social determinants of health inequities through settings: a rapid review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this