TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument
AU - Hendrie, Gilly A.
AU - Rebuli, Megan A.
AU - Golley, Rebecca K.
AU - Noakes, Manny
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: Methods to address misreporting associated with short dietary assessment instruments are needed. Objective: Our objective was to develop and evaluate the direct and indirect validity of adjustment factors applied to a short dietary assessment instrument to improve estimates of usual consumption of core and discretionary food and beverage intake. Design: Validation of the Short Food Survey relative to 24-hour recalls was performed. The Short Food Survey requires individuals to report their usual intake of fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy, and discretionary choices in multiples of standard servings. Adjustment factors were developed based on a ratio (usual portion size estimated from national data to standard serving size). The estimates of food group intakes (unadjusted and adjusted) were compared to 24-hour recalls. Participants/setting: Three population samples were used in this study. The direct validation used data from 61 Australian adults (collected 2013–2014). The indirect validation compared data from the 2011–2013 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n=9,435) to a sample of 145,975 who completed the Short Food Survey in a format that is freely available online (2015–2016). Main outcome measures: Food group intake (in servings) was measured. Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Direct validation showed the adjustment factors improved the survey-derived estimates of intake for all food groups except grain foods. For grains, the mean difference went from –0.6 servings to +1.2 to 1.5 servings. The absolute difference in food group intake between the adjusted Short Food Survey and recalls remained statistically significant for fruit, meat, dairy, and grains, but was not different for vegetables and discretionary foods. The indirect validation showed that the adjusted estimates of intake from the online Short Food Survey were closer to the population estimates reported by 24-hour recall for all food groups except meat. Conclusions: Adjustment factors can improve estimates of food group intake assessed using a short dietary assessment instrument for some but not all food groups.
AB - Background: Methods to address misreporting associated with short dietary assessment instruments are needed. Objective: Our objective was to develop and evaluate the direct and indirect validity of adjustment factors applied to a short dietary assessment instrument to improve estimates of usual consumption of core and discretionary food and beverage intake. Design: Validation of the Short Food Survey relative to 24-hour recalls was performed. The Short Food Survey requires individuals to report their usual intake of fruit, vegetables, grains, meat, dairy, and discretionary choices in multiples of standard servings. Adjustment factors were developed based on a ratio (usual portion size estimated from national data to standard serving size). The estimates of food group intakes (unadjusted and adjusted) were compared to 24-hour recalls. Participants/setting: Three population samples were used in this study. The direct validation used data from 61 Australian adults (collected 2013–2014). The indirect validation compared data from the 2011–2013 Australian National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n=9,435) to a sample of 145,975 who completed the Short Food Survey in a format that is freely available online (2015–2016). Main outcome measures: Food group intake (in servings) was measured. Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Direct validation showed the adjustment factors improved the survey-derived estimates of intake for all food groups except grain foods. For grains, the mean difference went from –0.6 servings to +1.2 to 1.5 servings. The absolute difference in food group intake between the adjusted Short Food Survey and recalls remained statistically significant for fruit, meat, dairy, and grains, but was not different for vegetables and discretionary foods. The indirect validation showed that the adjusted estimates of intake from the online Short Food Survey were closer to the population estimates reported by 24-hour recall for all food groups except meat. Conclusions: Adjustment factors can improve estimates of food group intake assessed using a short dietary assessment instrument for some but not all food groups.
KW - Food intake
KW - Misreporting
KW - Short dietary instrument
KW - Statistical adjustment
KW - Surveillance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046376225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.018
DO - 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.018
M3 - Article
C2 - 29724505
AN - SCOPUS:85046376225
VL - 118
SP - 1864
EP - 1873
JO - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
JF - Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
SN - 2212-2680
IS - 10
ER -