Abstract
The Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) is thought to assess implicit learning, which seems to be preserved with age. However, the reaction time (RT) measures employed on implicit-like tasks might be too unreliable to detect individual differences. We investigated whether RT-based measures mask age effects by comparing the performance of 43 younger and 35 older adults on SRTT and an explicit-like Predictive Sequence Learning Task (PSLT). RT-based measures (difference scores and a ratio) were collected for both tasks, and accuracy was additionally measured for PSLT. We also measured fluid abilities. The RT-difference scores indicated preserved SRTT and PSLT performance with age and did not correlate with fluid abilities, while ratio RT and the accuracy-based measures indicated age-related decline and correlated with fluid abilities. Therefore, RT-difference scores might mask individual differences, which compromises the interpretation of previous studies using SRTT.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 830-849 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | British Journal of Psychology |
Volume | 109 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- ageing
- implicit learning
- reaction time
- sequence learning
- serial reaction time