An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits

Tze Ping Loh, Rui Zhen Tan, Chun Yee Lim, Corey Markus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study describes an objective approach to deriving the clinical performance of autoverification rules to inform laboratory practice when implementing them. Anonymized historical laboratory data for 12 biochemistry measurands were collected and Box-Cox-transformed to approximate a Gaussian distribution. The historical laboratory data were assumed to be error-free. Using the probability theory, the clinical specificity of a set of autoverification limits can be derived by calculating the percentile values of the overall distribution of a measurand. The 5th and 95th percentile values of the laboratory data were calculated to achieve a 90% clinical specificity. Next, a predefined tolerable total error adopted from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program was applied to the extracted data before subjecting to Box-Cox transformation. Using a standard normal distribution, the clinical sensitivity can be derived from the probability of the Z-value to the right of the autoverification limit for a one-tailed probability and multiplied by two for a two-tailed probability. The clinical sensitivity showed an inverse relationship with between-subject biological variation. The laboratory can set and assess the clinical performance of its autoverification rules that conforms to its desired risk profile.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)597-601
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Laboratory Medicine
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2022

Keywords

  • Clinical performance
  • Probability theory
  • Autoverification limit
  • Autoverification rule
  • Laboratory error

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Objective Approach to Deriving the Clinical Performance of Autoverification Limits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this