Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index: a different interpretation-response by Williams et al.

Sheila M. Williams; Bernard J. Venn; Tracy Perry; Rachel Brown; Jim I. Mann; Tim J. Green

doi:10.1017/S0007114510000632

Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index: a different interpretation-response by Williams et al.

Sheila M. Williams, Bernard J. Venn, Tracy Perry, Rachel Brown, Jim I. Mann, Tim J. Green

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1697
Number of pages	1
Journal	British Journal of Nutrition
Volume	103
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114510000632
Publication status	Published - 14 Jun 2010
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1017/S0007114510000632Licence: In Copyright

Cite this

@article{d0db2e10a29f4ad595c0748769737725,

title = "Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index: a different interpretation-response by Williams et al.",

author = "Williams, {Sheila M.} and Venn, {Bernard J.} and Tracy Perry and Rachel Brown and Mann, {Jim I.} and Green, {Tim J.}",

year = "2010",

month = jun,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1017/S0007114510000632",

language = "English",

volume = "103",

pages = "1697",

journal = "British Journal of Nutrition",

issn = "0007-1145",

publisher = "CABI PUBLISHING",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index

T2 - a different interpretation-response by Williams et al.

AU - Williams, Sheila M.

AU - Venn, Bernard J.

AU - Perry, Tracy

AU - Brown, Rachel

AU - Mann, Jim I.

AU - Green, Tim J.

PY - 2010/6/14

Y1 - 2010/6/14

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953618028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007114510000632

DO - 10.1017/S0007114510000632

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:77953618028

SN - 0007-1145

VL - 103

SP - 1697

JO - British Journal of Nutrition

JF - British Journal of Nutrition

IS - 11

ER -

Another approach to estimating the reliability of the glycaemic index: a different interpretation-response by Williams et al.

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this