Antibiotic prophylaxis in hysterectomy - cefotaxime compared to ampicillin-tinidazole

P. J. McDonald, T. Sanders, G. Higgins, L. Finlay-Jones, M. Hakendorf, J. Turnidge, W. Jones

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The role of prophylactic cefotaxime and a combination of ampicillin and tinidazole was assessed in 201 patients undergoing hysterectomy. One hundred and twenty-five patients were evaluated in the abdominal hysterectomy group and 46 patients completed the protocol after vaginal hysterectomy. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either (1) no prophylactic antibiotic, (2) cefotaxime peroperatively for 24 h or (3) ampicillin/tinidazole peroperatively for 24 h. Both cefotaxime and ampicillin/tinidazole reduced the septic complication rate in abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Efficacy was most evident in reducing early urinary infections after abdominal hysterectomy (0.001<p<0.01). Cefotaxime and ampicillin/tinidazole were equally effective and no significant side-effects were demonstrated. Cefotaxime is recommended as a safe and effective agent for hysterectomy prophylaxis.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-230
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
    Volume14
    Issue numberSUPPL. B
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1984

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Antibiotic prophylaxis in hysterectomy - cefotaxime compared to ampicillin-tinidazole'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this