Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are underlying constructs measured by different quality of life instruments really that different? Using factor and latent path analysis to compare latent constructs measured by six instruments

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Abstract

Introduction: It is important that quality of life (QoL) instruments measure the underlying QoL constructs that are important in their target population. A plethora of QoL instruments designed to measure different QoL constructs exist. However, it is not always clear whether the constructs purportedly measured by these instruments are really that different especially when similar language is used in describing the instruments. This study compares the constructs measured by six instruments focussing on health-related QoL (EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L)), older-people-specific QoL (Older People’s Quality of Life brief questionnaire (OPQoL-brief)), social-care-related QoL (Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT)), capabilities (ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people (ICECAP-O), mastery (Pearlin Mastery Scale) and self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale).
Original languageEnglish
Pages273
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event2019 World Congress on Health Economics - Basel, Switzerland
Duration: 13 Jul 201917 Jul 2019

Conference

Conference2019 World Congress on Health Economics
Country/TerritorySwitzerland
CityBasel
Period13/07/1917/07/19

Keywords

  • Quality of life
  • QoL instruments
  • QoL constructs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are underlying constructs measured by different quality of life instruments really that different? Using factor and latent path analysis to compare latent constructs measured by six instruments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this