Abstract
Background
For over two decades, the Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (QCAA) has used Arnold’s tri-dimensional perspective of movement (1979, 1988) as a framework for its senior Physical Education (PE) syllabus documents (1998, 2004, 2010, and 2018). As the most recent version, the Queensland Senior Physical Education Syllabus-2019 (QSPES) cites Arnold’s perspective as ‘a philosophical and educative framework to promote deep learning in three dimensions: about, through and in movement contexts’ (QCAA Citation2018, 1), it is reasoned these principles will be evident throughout this Australian state syllabus.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the claimed adherence to the Arnoldian perspective in the QSPES (QCAA Citation2018) as stated in its curriculum intention statement (see QCAA Citation2018, 1).
Discussion
The authors suggest that a reinterpretation of Arnold’s intention has occurred in the application of his perspective to the QSPES (QCAA Citation2018) and suggest what may occur as a consequence of this reinterpretation.
Conclusion
We conclude by discussing the potential effects of this reoriented view of Arnold’s perspective on students, teachers, and PE in general. The discussion highlights a familiar story of PE attempting to legitimise itself through science and academia and how in most cases the warnings against such validation have fallen on deaf ears.
For over two decades, the Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority (QCAA) has used Arnold’s tri-dimensional perspective of movement (1979, 1988) as a framework for its senior Physical Education (PE) syllabus documents (1998, 2004, 2010, and 2018). As the most recent version, the Queensland Senior Physical Education Syllabus-2019 (QSPES) cites Arnold’s perspective as ‘a philosophical and educative framework to promote deep learning in three dimensions: about, through and in movement contexts’ (QCAA Citation2018, 1), it is reasoned these principles will be evident throughout this Australian state syllabus.
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the claimed adherence to the Arnoldian perspective in the QSPES (QCAA Citation2018) as stated in its curriculum intention statement (see QCAA Citation2018, 1).
Discussion
The authors suggest that a reinterpretation of Arnold’s intention has occurred in the application of his perspective to the QSPES (QCAA Citation2018) and suggest what may occur as a consequence of this reinterpretation.
Conclusion
We conclude by discussing the potential effects of this reoriented view of Arnold’s perspective on students, teachers, and PE in general. The discussion highlights a familiar story of PE attempting to legitimise itself through science and academia and how in most cases the warnings against such validation have fallen on deaf ears.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy |
Early online date | 16 Oct 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 16 Oct 2023 |
Keywords
- Arnold
- syllabus
- slippage
- academicisation