Abstract
This chapter explains that Article 7(2) of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention is primarily concerned with indigenous restitution claims. It details the development of approaches to identifying indigenous peoples and defining indigenous cultural objects, and notes how indigenous communities suffer from the UNIDROIT Convention’s lack of retroactivity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The 1970 UNESCO and 1995 UNIDROIT Conventions on Stolen or Illegally Transferred Cultural Property |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Commentary |
| Editors | Ana Filipa Vrdoljak, Andrzej Jakubowski, Alessandro Chechi |
| Place of Publication | Oxford, UK |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 620-631 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191939327 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780192846884 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Indigenous peoples
- Ownership
- Property
- Restitution
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Article 7(2) of the 1995 UNIDROIT Convention: Indigenous Restitution Claims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver