TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing Torque Transfer in Conduction System Pacing
T2 - Development and Evaluation of an Ex Vivo Model
AU - Chapman, Darius
AU - Morgan, Fraser
AU - Tiver, Kathryn D.
AU - Dharmaprani, Dhani
AU - Jenkins, Evan
AU - Ullah, Shahid
AU - Shahrbabaki, Sohbhan Salari
AU - Strong, Campbell
AU - Ganesan, Anand N.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Background: Conduction system pacing (CSP) faces challenges in achieving reliable and safe deployments. Complex interactions between tissue and lead tip can result in endocardial entanglement, a drill effect that prevents penetration. No verified ex vivo model exists to quantitatively assess this relationship. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively characterize CSP lead tip to tissue responses for 4 commonly used leads. Methods: CSP leads (from Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Abbott) were examined for helix rotation efficiency in ex vivo ovine right ventricular septa. A custom jig was utilized for rotation measurements. Fifteen turns were executed, documenting tissue-interface changes every 90° using high-resolution photography. Response curves (input rotation vs helix rotation) were evaluated using piecewise linear regression, with a focus on output vs input response slopes and torque breakpoint events. Results: We analyzed 3,840 quarter-turn CSP insertions with 4 different lead types. Helix rotations were consistently less than input: Abbott Tendril = 0.21:1, Medtronic 3830 = 0.21:1, Biotronik Solia = 0.47:1, and Boston Scientific Ingevity = 0.56:1. Torque breakpoint events were observed on average 7.22 times per insertion (95% CI: 6.08-8.35; P = NS) across all leads. In 57.8% of insertions (37 of 64), uncontrolled torque breakpoint events occurred, signaling unexpected excess helix rotations.Conclusions: Using a robust ex vivo model, we revealed a muted helix rotation response compared with input turns on the lead, and frequent torque change events during insertion. This is critical for CSP implanters, emphasizing the potential for unexpected torque breakpoint events, and suggesting the need for novel lead designs or deployment methods to enhance CSP efficiency and safety.
AB - Background: Conduction system pacing (CSP) faces challenges in achieving reliable and safe deployments. Complex interactions between tissue and lead tip can result in endocardial entanglement, a drill effect that prevents penetration. No verified ex vivo model exists to quantitatively assess this relationship. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to quantitatively characterize CSP lead tip to tissue responses for 4 commonly used leads. Methods: CSP leads (from Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Abbott) were examined for helix rotation efficiency in ex vivo ovine right ventricular septa. A custom jig was utilized for rotation measurements. Fifteen turns were executed, documenting tissue-interface changes every 90° using high-resolution photography. Response curves (input rotation vs helix rotation) were evaluated using piecewise linear regression, with a focus on output vs input response slopes and torque breakpoint events. Results: We analyzed 3,840 quarter-turn CSP insertions with 4 different lead types. Helix rotations were consistently less than input: Abbott Tendril = 0.21:1, Medtronic 3830 = 0.21:1, Biotronik Solia = 0.47:1, and Boston Scientific Ingevity = 0.56:1. Torque breakpoint events were observed on average 7.22 times per insertion (95% CI: 6.08-8.35; P = NS) across all leads. In 57.8% of insertions (37 of 64), uncontrolled torque breakpoint events occurred, signaling unexpected excess helix rotations.Conclusions: Using a robust ex vivo model, we revealed a muted helix rotation response compared with input turns on the lead, and frequent torque change events during insertion. This is critical for CSP implanters, emphasizing the potential for unexpected torque breakpoint events, and suggesting the need for novel lead designs or deployment methods to enhance CSP efficiency and safety.
KW - conduction system pacing
KW - ex vivo model
KW - lead deployment
KW - rotational response
KW - torque transfer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184795291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/2010522
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.10.035
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.10.035
M3 - Article
C2 - 38206259
AN - SCOPUS:85184795291
SN - 2405-500X
VL - 10
SP - 306
EP - 315
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 2
ER -