Assessment of analytical bias in ferritin assays and impact on functional reference limits

Serum ferritin is currently the recommended laboratory test to investigate iron deficiency. There have been efforts to standardise serum ferritin assays with implementation of traceability to the World Health Organization reference standard. We evaluate the analytical bias among five widely used commercial ferritin assays in Australia. The relationship between serum ferritin and erythrocyte parameters was recently explored to derive functional reference limits. Residual patient serum specimens were analysed by five participating laboratories that utilised a different ferritin assay, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Roche, Siemens, and Ortho. Using data mining approach, functional reference limits for Siemens, Abbott, and Ortho serum ferritin methods were derived and compared. At clinically relevant ferritin decision points, compared to the Beckman method, the Roche assay showed higher results ranging from 6 μg/L (31%) at the lowest decision point to 575 μg/L (57%) at the highest decision point. In contrast, the Ortho method underestimated ferritin results at lower decision points of 20 and 30 μg/L, with estimated ferritin results of 16 μg/L (–19%) and 27 μg/L (–12%), respectively. The Abbott and Siemens assays showed a positive bias which was introduced at differing decision points. The comparison of the Siemens and Ortho methods presents similar inflection points between the two assays in the establishment of functional reference limits for serum ferritin. There remain significant biases among some of the commonly used commercial ferritin assays in Australia. More studies are needed to assess if functional reference limits are a way to overcome method commutability issues.