Assessment of clinical reasoning: Three evolutions of thought

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Although assessing clinical reasoning is almost universally considered central to medical education it is not a straightforward issue. In the past decades, our insights into clinical reasoning as a phenomenon, and consequently the best ways to assess it, have undergone significant changes. In this article, we describe how the interplay between fundamental research, practical applications, and evaluative research has pushed the evolution of our thinking and our practices in assessing clinical reasoning.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)
Early online date17 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • assessment
  • clinical reasoning

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of clinical reasoning: Three evolutions of thought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this