Assessment of clinical reasoning: Three evolutions of thought

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Although assessing clinical reasoning is almost universally considered central to medical education it is not a straightforward issue. In the past decades, our insights into clinical reasoning as a phenomenon, and consequently the best ways to assess it, have undergone significant changes. In this article, we describe how the interplay between fundamental research, practical applications, and evaluative research has pushed the evolution of our thinking and our practices in assessing clinical reasoning.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)191-196
    Number of pages6
    JournalDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)
    Volume7
    Issue number3
    Early online date17 Mar 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2020

    Keywords

    • Assessment
    • Clinical Reasoning
    • Evolution of Thought

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of clinical reasoning: Three evolutions of thought'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this