Assessment of the internal dynamics of the Australian Water Balance Model under different calibration regimes

Li Li, Martin Lambert, Holger Maier, Daniel Partington, Craig Simmons

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Conceptual rainfall runoff models are used extensively in practice, as they provide a good balance between transparency and computational and data requirements. However, the degree to which they are able to represent underlying physical processes is poorly understood. This is because the performance of such models is generally assessed based on their ability to match total streamflow, rather than component processes. In this paper, the ability of the Australian Water Balance Model (AWBM) to represent baseflow and quickflow is assessed for 66 synthetic catchments with different physical characteristics and hydrological inputs under seven calibration regimes utilising a shuffled complex evolution (SCE) algorithm. The "observed" total-, base- and quick-flow hydrographs for these catchments are generated using HydroGeoSphere. The results indicate that while AWBM is generally able to match total streamflow well, the same does not apply to baseflow and quickflow, suggesting that these processes are not represented well by AWBM.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)57-68
    Number of pages12
    JournalEnvironmental Modelling and Software
    Volume66
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2015

    Keywords

    • Australian Water Balance Model
    • Baseflow
    • Calibration
    • HydroGeoSphere
    • Integrated surface water/groundwater model
    • Regression models
    • Virtual laboratory

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of the internal dynamics of the Australian Water Balance Model under different calibration regimes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this