TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between Congenital Anomalies and Late-Onset Bacterial Infections in Neonates Admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Australia and New Zealand
T2 - A Population-Based Cohort Study
AU - Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad
AU - Spotswood, Naomi
AU - Strunk, Tobias
AU - Parmar, Trisha
AU - Schindler, Tim
AU - Popat, Himanshu
AU - Chow, Sharon Sue Wen
AU - Lui, Kei
AU - The Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network
AU - Morris, Scott
AU - Schmidt, Peter
AU - Chauhan, Manbir
AU - Korostenski, Larissa
AU - Sharp, Mary
AU - Resnick, Steven
AU - Thomas, Rebecca
AU - Strunk, Tobias
AU - Stack, Jacqueline
AU - Birch, Pita
AU - Oliver, Tori
AU - Casalaz, Dan
AU - Holberton, Jim
AU - Stewart, Alice
AU - Hunt, Rod
AU - Tan, Kenneth
AU - Cooke, Lucy
AU - Downe, Lyn
AU - Davis, Jonathan
AU - Stewart, Michael
AU - Berry, Andrew
AU - Hickey, Leah
AU - Kgosiemang, Mantho
AU - Paoli, Tony De
AU - Spotswood, Naomi
AU - Bolisetty, Srinivas
AU - Lui, Kei
AU - Staub, Eveline
AU - Greenhalgh, Mark
AU - Koorts, Pieter
AU - Jacobs, Sue
AU - Keir, Amy
AU - Collins, Clare
AU - Numa, Andrew
AU - Carlisle, Hazel
AU - Badawi, Nadia
AU - Popat, Himanshu
AU - Alcock, Gary
AU - Luig, Melissa
AU - Kent, Alison
AU - Dixon, Bronwyn
AU - Darlow, Brian
AU - Fowlie, Peter
AU - Kelly, Andrew
AU - Bloomfield, Guy
AU - Buksh, Mariam
AU - Battin, Malcolm
AU - Boom, Jutta Van Den
AU - Miller, Helen
AU - Allermo-Fletcher, Angelica
AU - Jacobs, Claire
AU - Rajadurai, Victor Samuel
AU - Lam, Simon
AU - Chambers, Georgina
AU - Barker, David
AU - Dhawan, Anjali
AU - Merida, Natalie
AU - Harrison, Denise
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Introduction: Compromised neonatal intensive care unit neonates are at risk of acquiring late-onset infections (lateonset sepsis [LOS]). Neonates born with congenital anomalies (CAs) could have an additional LOS risk. Methods: Utilising the population-based Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network data from 2007 to 2017, bacterial LOS rates were determined in very preterm (VPT, <32 week), moderately preterm (MPT, 32-36 weeks), and term (FT, 37-41 weeks) neonates with or without CA. Stratified by major surgery, the association between CA and bacterial LOS was evaluated. Results: Of 102,808 neonates, 37.7%, 32.8%, and 29.6% were born VPT, MPT, and FT, respectively. Among these, 3.4% VPT, 7.5% MPT, and 16.2% FT neonates had CA. VPT neonates had the highest LOS rate (11.1%), compared to MPT (1.8%) and FT (1.8%) neonates. LOS rates were higher in CA neonates than those without (8.2% versus 5.1% adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-1.92). Neonates with surgery had a higher LOS rate (14.2%) than neonates without surgery (4.4%, p < 0.001). Among the neonates without surgery, CA neonates had consistently higher LOS rates than those without CA (VPT 14.3% vs. 9.6% [aRR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.11-1.57]; MPT 4% vs. 0.9% [aRR 4.45, 95% CI: 3.23-6.14]; and FT 2% vs. 0.7% [aRR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.97-4.18]). For the neonates with surgery, CAs were not associated with additional LOS risks. Conclusion: Overall we reported higher rates of LOS in neonates with CA compared to those without CA. Regardless of gestation, CA was associated with an increased LOS risk among nonsurgical neonates. Optimisation of infection prevention strategies for CA neonates should be explored. Future studies are needed to evaluate if the infection risk is caused by CA or associated complications.
AB - Introduction: Compromised neonatal intensive care unit neonates are at risk of acquiring late-onset infections (lateonset sepsis [LOS]). Neonates born with congenital anomalies (CAs) could have an additional LOS risk. Methods: Utilising the population-based Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network data from 2007 to 2017, bacterial LOS rates were determined in very preterm (VPT, <32 week), moderately preterm (MPT, 32-36 weeks), and term (FT, 37-41 weeks) neonates with or without CA. Stratified by major surgery, the association between CA and bacterial LOS was evaluated. Results: Of 102,808 neonates, 37.7%, 32.8%, and 29.6% were born VPT, MPT, and FT, respectively. Among these, 3.4% VPT, 7.5% MPT, and 16.2% FT neonates had CA. VPT neonates had the highest LOS rate (11.1%), compared to MPT (1.8%) and FT (1.8%) neonates. LOS rates were higher in CA neonates than those without (8.2% versus 5.1% adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-1.92). Neonates with surgery had a higher LOS rate (14.2%) than neonates without surgery (4.4%, p < 0.001). Among the neonates without surgery, CA neonates had consistently higher LOS rates than those without CA (VPT 14.3% vs. 9.6% [aRR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.11-1.57]; MPT 4% vs. 0.9% [aRR 4.45, 95% CI: 3.23-6.14]; and FT 2% vs. 0.7% [aRR 2.87, 95% CI: 1.97-4.18]). For the neonates with surgery, CAs were not associated with additional LOS risks. Conclusion: Overall we reported higher rates of LOS in neonates with CA compared to those without CA. Regardless of gestation, CA was associated with an increased LOS risk among nonsurgical neonates. Optimisation of infection prevention strategies for CA neonates should be explored. Future studies are needed to evaluate if the infection risk is caused by CA or associated complications.
KW - Bacterial infections
KW - Birth defects
KW - Congenital anomalies
KW - Infections
KW - Neonatal intensive care units
KW - Sepsis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205253339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000540276
DO - 10.1159/000540276
M3 - Article
C2 - 39299217
AN - SCOPUS:85205253339
SN - 1661-7800
VL - 122
SP - 95
EP - 105
JO - Neonatology
JF - Neonatology
IS - 1
ER -