Australian older persons mental health inpatient and ambulatory services in 2015–2020 – A descriptive analysis and commentary

Matthew Brazel, Stephen Allison, Tarun Bastiampillai, Stephen Kisely, Samantha M. Loi, Jeffrey C.L. Looi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To provide a commentary on Australian state/territory older persons mental health service (OPMHS) expenditure, inpatient and outpatient services and key performance indicators (KPIs). 

Method: Descriptive analysis of data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), the Australian Bureau of Statistics and the World Health Organisation. 

Results: Between 2015–16 and 2019–20, annual expenditure on OPMHS in Australia increased by an average of only 2.3%, compared to 2.9% for all population groups, despite an increase in the number of over 65 year olds. Per capita recurrent expenditure on OPMHS decreased by an average of 1% annually. Australia’s total mental health beds increased, whereas OPMHS beds decreased, mainly due to a reduction in non-acute beds. Outcomes for OPMHS admissions were similar to other age groups, except for a longer length of stay and reduced readmission rate. Older Australians accessed ambulatory mental health care at a lower rate and had a lower rate of improvement after a completed episode. 

Conclusions: OPMHS expenditure has not increased at commensurate levels compared to other populations. The mental health of people aged over 65 appears to be a neglected policy priority in Australia. The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety may herald service and expenditure changes.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages4
JournalAustralasian Psychiatry
Early online date6 Nov 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Australia
  • beds
  • expenditure
  • KPIs
  • Older persons

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Australian older persons mental health inpatient and ambulatory services in 2015–2020 – A descriptive analysis and commentary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this