Barriers to seeking help for skin cancer detection in Rural Australia

Kate Fennell, Kimberley Martin, Carlene Wilson, Camilla Trenerry, Greg Sharplin, James Dollman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    23 Citations (Scopus)
    35 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study explores rural South Australians’ barriers to help-seeking for skin cancer detection. A total of 201 randomly selected rural adults (18–94 years, 66% female) were presented with a skin-cancer-related scenario via telephone and were asked the extent to which various barriers would impede their help-seeking, based on an amended version of the Barriers to Help-Seeking Scale. Older (≥63 years) and less educated participants endorsed barriers more strongly than their younger, more educated counterparts in the following domains; “Concrete barriers and distrust of caregivers”, “Emotional control”, “Minimising problem and Normalisation”, “Need for control and self-reliance” (every domain other than “Privacy”). Socioeconomic disadvantage, gender, and farmer status did not predict stronger overall barriers, but some gender and occupation-related differences were detected at the item level. Farmers were also more likely to endorse the “Minimising problem and normalization” domain than their non-farmer working rural counterparts. Widely endorsed barriers included the tendency to minimise the problem, a desire to remain in control/not be influenced by others, reluctance to show emotion or complain, and having concerns about privacy or waiting times.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number19
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
    Volume6
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

    Keywords

    • Barrier
    • Cancer
    • Help
    • Help-seeking
    • Physician-patient relations
    • Psychosocial
    • Rural
    • Skin

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Barriers to seeking help for skin cancer detection in Rural Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this