Abstract
Writing about a university restructure that was traumatic for both staff and the students who experienced it, I use a 'critical incident' (Tripp 1994) to identify the contradictions between what we are told and what we experience. A member of management has said that staff whose research areas are broadly concerned with social justice have 'shown no leadership, done nothing worthwhile and are not bringing in money'. I use this as a focus as I 'speak back' in defence of education that does not fit the neoliberal mould. I seek to uncover interests in the way leadership and worth are defined with a focus on what sort of leadership and worth has nurtured my own academic journey. Underlining my work is an assertion that higher education belongs to students, academics and the public.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 42-47 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Social Alternatives |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- restructure
- university restructure
- critical incident
- neoliberal
- neoliberalism
- neoliberal education
- leadership
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Being restructured': A student's perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver