Abstract
The landmark decision in Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR I
significantly altered Australian law. However, it left many questions unanswered. Some questions have been resolved, rightly or wrongly, by the courts and parliaments and others remain to be addressed. Native Title Cor'poratios: A Legal and Anthropological Analysis attempts to respond to some of the questions that
have remained problematic (p.v): What happens after native title has been
determined to exist'? Who will hold the native title'? Who will decide what can
happen to areas of land and water where native title exists?
significantly altered Australian law. However, it left many questions unanswered. Some questions have been resolved, rightly or wrongly, by the courts and parliaments and others remain to be addressed. Native Title Cor'poratios: A Legal and Anthropological Analysis attempts to respond to some of the questions that
have remained problematic (p.v): What happens after native title has been
determined to exist'? Who will hold the native title'? Who will decide what can
happen to areas of land and water where native title exists?
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 100-101 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Alternative Law Journal |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2002 |
Keywords
- Native title management
- Mabo