Boundaries, Relationality, and Style Provinces in Australian Rock Art

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Identifying style provinces is a popular topic of enquiry in Australian rock art research. At the core of these studies is the focus on the style or manner of depiction of motifs as a key indicator for determining patterns of motif similarity and difference, and their corresponding spatial distribution. In identifying spatial continuities and discontinuities based on a formal analysis of rock art motifs fixed in place, researchers sometimes limit their ability to understand the relational dimensions associated with past and present graphic systems more broadly. This chapter reviews and critiques the formal, style-based methods of delineating discontinuities in rock art as boundaries and uses Nancy Williams’s work on Yolngu boundaries as a framework to further build on research into spatial discontinuities in rock art as flexible, intersecting, and fluid. In doing so, the authors also draw attention to the role of relational understandings and decorative portable objects in characterizing intersecting style-based discontinuities. Using two case studies from northern Australia, they demonstrate how the spatial and social boundaries expressed in rock art are often much more complex than originally envisaged.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Indigenous Australia and New Guinea
EditorsIan McNiven, Bruno David
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter27
Pages717-742
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9780190095642
ISBN (Print)9780190095611, 9780190095628
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • rock art
  • Australia
  • social boundaries
  • style province
  • boundaries
  • portable art
  • relationality
  • ethnography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Boundaries, Relationality, and Style Provinces in Australian Rock Art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this