Boundary Condition Nomenclature Confusion in Groundwater Flow Modeling

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To solve the partial differential equations of groundwater flow, the information about head (h) and/or head gradient (∇h) must be specified along the boundaries of a model domain. The descriptors of different boundary condition (BC) types are drawn from founding mathematicians mainly of the 19th century (Cheng and Cheng 2005). Mathematically, there are five different BC types, including: Dirichlet (Type 1), Neumann (Type 2), Robin (Type 3), Cauchy and Mixed (Liu 2018). These names are sometimes used in communicating the BCs of groundwater flow models, and therefore, correct association between nomenclature and the mathematical form of BCs is important for properly communicating model characteristics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)664-668
Number of pages5
JournalGroundwater
Volume57
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Keywords

  • Boundary condition
  • groundwater flow modeling
  • Dirichlet BC

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Boundary Condition Nomenclature Confusion in Groundwater Flow Modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this