Bridging diverging perspectives and repairing damaged relationships in the aftermath of workplace transgressions

Tyler Okimoto, Michael Wenzel

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Workplace transgressions elicit a variety of opinions about their meaning and what is required to address them. This diversity in views makes it difficult for managers to identify a mutually satisfactory response and to enable repair of the relationships between the affected parties. We develop a conceptual model for understanding how to bridge these diverging perspectives and foster relationship repair. Specifically, we argue that effective relationship repair is dependent on the parties' reciprocal concern for others' viewpoints and collective engagement in the justice repair process. This approach enhances our understanding of the interdependency between justice and reconciliation/reintegration, while also providing theoretical insight into the processes underlying restorative conferencing, innovations that promise to help managers heal damaged organizational bonds.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)443-473
    Number of pages31
    JournalBUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2014

    Keywords

    • Justice repair
    • Reconciliation
    • Reintegration
    • Relationship repair
    • Restorative justice
    • Workplace transgressions

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging diverging perspectives and repairing damaged relationships in the aftermath of workplace transgressions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this