Abstract
In a face recognition, mini-lineup experiment we examined two aspects of the use of confidence about lineups. We modified the lineup procedure attempting to eliminate the difference in confidence-accuracy relationship between positive (old or identification) and negative (new or not present) decisions. In the modified procedure, participants: (1) selected the lineup member that best matched their memory of the target; (2) rated their confidence that the best match was indeed the target; and (3) indicated (. yes/. no) whether the best match was the target. Although the modified procedure produced higher accuracy than a standard simultaneous procedure, there was no evidence that it affected the confidence-accuracy relationship. Additionally, the modified procedure also allowed us to compare the extent to which confidence ratings versus binary recognition decisions better discriminated studied from unstudied faces. The results revealed a clear advantage for confidence, but indicated that binary responses were also a unique predictor.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 152-157 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- Confidence
- Confidence-accuracy
- Eyewitness identification
- Recognition memory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can a modified lineup procedure improve the usefulness of confidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver