Abstract
The endurance of homeopathy within parts of the medical profession is not primarily an empirical puzzle but rather an epistemological fault line. While medicine, since the Enlightenment (late seventeenth century–early nineteenth century CE, when understood as a long-term cultural process), has gradually anchored itself in principles and mechanisms open to empirical scrutiny and causal explanation, homeopathy still operates on concepts formulated prior to the discovery of microbes, pharmacological receptors, or the conservation of mass.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 805-806 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Internal and Emergency Medicine |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 28 Jan 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2026 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Cognitive dissonance
- Epistemology
- Evidence-based medicine
- Homeopathy
- Medical ethics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can a science endorse its antithesis? Medicine and the homeopathy paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver