Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Can a science endorse its antithesis? Medicine and the homeopathy paradox

  • Francesco M. Galassi
  • , Elena Varotto
  • , Roberto Burioni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The endurance of homeopathy within parts of the medical profession is not primarily an empirical puzzle but rather an epistemological fault line. While medicine, since the Enlightenment (late seventeenth century–early nineteenth century CE, when understood as a long-term cultural process), has gradually anchored itself in principles and mechanisms open to empirical scrutiny and causal explanation, homeopathy still operates on concepts formulated prior to the discovery of microbes, pharmacological receptors, or the conservation of mass.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)805-806
Number of pages2
JournalInternal and Emergency Medicine
Volume21
Issue number3
Early online date28 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Cognitive dissonance
  • Epistemology
  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Homeopathy
  • Medical ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can a science endorse its antithesis? Medicine and the homeopathy paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this