TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics, supports, and quality of life of Irish adults with intellectual disability in life-sharing residential communities
AU - Fahey, Aine
AU - Walsh, Patricia Noonan
AU - Emerson, Eric
AU - Guerin, Suzanne
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - BackgroundFew empirical studies have compared quality and outcomes for residents with intellectual disability across intentional communities such as those organised by the Camphill communities in Ireland. MethodUsing a multi-element research protocol developed for an earlier large study, data were gathered about the characteristics of N29 participants living in life-sharing residences organised by Camphill, management procedures, and outcomes for residents. Comparable data were available for N125 adults in group homes or campus residences. ResultsCamphill residents reported a smaller size of household, higher staffing ratios, homely living areas, low levels of institutionalised practices such as social distance, reciprocal relationships with houseparents, and well-developed management procedures, as well as less choice, but were not found to be better on a range of other objective measures. ConclusionAlthough modest in scale, present findings suggest that the value of applying distinctive benefits of life-sharing communities in more typical residential settings for people with intellectual disability should be investigated further to inform current policy debates.
AB - BackgroundFew empirical studies have compared quality and outcomes for residents with intellectual disability across intentional communities such as those organised by the Camphill communities in Ireland. MethodUsing a multi-element research protocol developed for an earlier large study, data were gathered about the characteristics of N29 participants living in life-sharing residences organised by Camphill, management procedures, and outcomes for residents. Comparable data were available for N125 adults in group homes or campus residences. ResultsCamphill residents reported a smaller size of household, higher staffing ratios, homely living areas, low levels of institutionalised practices such as social distance, reciprocal relationships with houseparents, and well-developed management procedures, as well as less choice, but were not found to be better on a range of other objective measures. ConclusionAlthough modest in scale, present findings suggest that the value of applying distinctive benefits of life-sharing communities in more typical residential settings for people with intellectual disability should be investigated further to inform current policy debates.
KW - communities
KW - life-sharing
KW - residential
KW - supports
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953830865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/13668251003724635
DO - 10.3109/13668251003724635
M3 - Article
C2 - 20560694
AN - SCOPUS:77953830865
SN - 1366-8250
VL - 35
SP - 66
EP - 76
JO - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
JF - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
IS - 2
ER -