Clinical effectiveness and analytical quality of a national pointof- care testing network for sexually transmitted infections integrated into rural and remote primary care clinics in Australia, 2016–2022: an observational program evaluation

Louise Causer, James Ward, Kirsty Smith, Amit Saha, Kelly Andrewartha, Handan Wand, Belinda Hengel, Steven Badman, Annie Tangey, Sue Matthews, Donna B. Mak, Manoji Gunathilake, Elizabeth Moore, David Speers, David Persing, David Anderson, David Whiley, Lisa Maher, David Regan, Basil DonovanChristopher Fairley, John Kaldor, Mark Shephard, Rebecca Guy, TTANGO2 Collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract


Background
To address inequitable diagnostic access and improve time-to-treatment for First Nations peoples, molecular point-of-care (POC) testing for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomonas was integrated into 49 primary care clinics across Australia. We conducted an observational evaluation to determine clinical effectiveness and analytical quality of POC testing delivered through this national program.

Methods
We evaluated (i) implementation by measuring trends in mean monthly POC testing; ii) clinical effectiveness by comparing proportions of positive patients treated by historical control/intervention period and by test type, and calculated infectious days averted; (iii) analytical quality by calculating result concordance by test type, and proportion of unsuccessful POC tests.

Findings
Between 2016 and 2022, 46,153 POC tests were performed; an increasing mean monthly testing trend was observed in the first four years (p < 0.0001). A greater proportion of chlamydia/gonorrhoea positives were treated in intervention compared with historical control periods (≤2 days: 37% vs 22% [RR 1.68; 95% CI 1.12, 2.53]; ≤7 days: 48% vs 30% [RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.10, 2.33]; ≤120 days: 79% vs 54% [RR 1.46; 95% CI 1.10, 1.95]); similarly for trichomonas positives and by test type. POC testing for chlamydia, gonorrhoea and trichomonas averted 4930, 5620 and 7075 infectious days, respectively. Results concordance was high [99.0% (chlamydia), 99.3% (gonorrhoea) and 98.9% (trichomonas)]; unsuccessful POC test proportion was 1.8% for chlamydia/gonorrhoea and 2.1% for trichomonas. Interpretation Molecular POC testing was successfully integrated into primary care settings as part of a routinely implemented program achieving significant clinical benefits with high analytical quality. In addition to the individual health benefits of earlier treatment, fewer infective days could contribute to reduced transmissions in First Nations communities.

Funding
This work was supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Partnership Grant (APP1092503), the Australian Government Department of Health, Western Australia and Queensland Departments of Health.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101110
Number of pages12
JournalThe Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
Volume48
Early online date10 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Sexually transmitted infections (STIs)
  • clinical effectiveness
  • Analytical quality
  • rural
  • remote
  • primary care
  • Clinical effectiveness
  • Implementation
  • Gonorrhoea
  • POC testing
  • Chlamydia
  • Trichomoniasis
  • Scaling up
  • Sexually transmitted infections

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical effectiveness and analytical quality of a national pointof- care testing network for sexually transmitted infections integrated into rural and remote primary care clinics in Australia, 2016–2022: an observational program evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this