Closing the Gap: Examining how the problem of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage is represented in policy

Jessica Dawson, Martha Augoustinos, David Sjoberg, Kootsy Canuto, Karen Glover, Alice Rumbold

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Policymaking is increasingly being recognised as a value-laden process in which social problems are not simply identified and measured, but discursively produced. The current study examined how the problem of Indigenous disadvantage is produced within the original Closing the Gap policy framework, to identify underlying assumptions and problem representations. Bacchi's “What's the Problem Represented to be?” approach was used as the analytic framework, with critical discursive analysis used for a fine-grained discourse analysis. Findings indicate that the problem of Indigenous disadvantage is produced in culturally limited terms, demonstrates lifestyle drift and relies on deficit-based narratives of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, which collectively work to produce disadvantage as a product of individual behaviours, and problematises Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as inherently dysfunctional. Potential lived effects of these discourses are discussed, and future areas of research are identified.

    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages17
    JournalAustralian Journal of Social Issues
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jul 2020

    Keywords

    • Aboriginal
    • deficit discourse
    • Indigenous policy
    • lifestyle drift
    • problem representation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Closing the Gap: Examining how the problem of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander disadvantage is represented in policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this