TY - JOUR
T1 - Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia
T2 - Comparing airborne measurements with inventories
AU - Neininger, Bruno G.
AU - Kelly, Bryce F.J.
AU - Hacker, Jorg M.
AU - Lu, Xinyi
AU - Schwietzke, Stefan
PY - 2021/11/15
Y1 - 2021/11/15
N2 - Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH 4) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Spatially resolved CH 4 emissions were quantified from all major sources based on top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, the latter using Australia's UNFCCC reporting workflow. Based on our TD-validated BU inventory, CSG sources emit about 0.4% of the produced gas, comparable to onshore dry gas fields in the USA and The Netherlands, but substantially smaller than in other onshore regions, especially those where oil is co-produced (wet gas). The CSG CH 4 emission per unit of gas production determined in this study is two to three times higher than existing inventories for the region. Our results indicate that the BU emission factors for feedlots and grazing cattle need review, possibly requiring an increase for Queensland's conditions. In some subregions, the BU estimate for gathering and boosting stations is potentially too high. The results from our iterative BU inventory process, which feeds into TD data, illustrate how global characterization of CH 4 emissions could be improved by incorporating empirical TD verification surveys into national reporting. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)'.
AB - Coal seam gas (CSG) accounts for about one-quarter of natural gas production in Australia and rapidly increasing amounts globally. This is the first study worldwide using airborne measurement techniques to quantify methane (CH 4) emissions from a producing CSG field: the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Spatially resolved CH 4 emissions were quantified from all major sources based on top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, the latter using Australia's UNFCCC reporting workflow. Based on our TD-validated BU inventory, CSG sources emit about 0.4% of the produced gas, comparable to onshore dry gas fields in the USA and The Netherlands, but substantially smaller than in other onshore regions, especially those where oil is co-produced (wet gas). The CSG CH 4 emission per unit of gas production determined in this study is two to three times higher than existing inventories for the region. Our results indicate that the BU emission factors for feedlots and grazing cattle need review, possibly requiring an increase for Queensland's conditions. In some subregions, the BU estimate for gathering and boosting stations is potentially too high. The results from our iterative BU inventory process, which feeds into TD data, illustrate how global characterization of CH 4 emissions could be improved by incorporating empirical TD verification surveys into national reporting. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 1)'.
KW - airborne measurements
KW - Australia
KW - climate change
KW - coal seam gas
KW - methane
KW - Surat Basin
KW - UNFCCC inventory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110058279&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rsta.2020.0458
DO - 10.1098/rsta.2020.0458
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110058279
SN - 1364-503X
VL - 379
JO - Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London Series A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London Series A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
IS - 2210
M1 - 20200458
ER -