TY - JOUR
T1 - Coercive parenting
T2 - modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors in parents of children with developmental disabilities
AU - Day, J. J.
AU - Hodges, J.
AU - Mazzucchelli, T. G.
AU - Sofronoff, K.
AU - Sanders, M. R.
AU - Einfeld, S.
AU - Tonge, B.
AU - Gray, K. M.
AU - MHYPeDD Project Team
AU - Aery, Anagha
AU - Andersson, Ellaina
AU - Arciuli, Joanne
AU - Arora, Sheena
AU - Bezzina, Louise
AU - Blackmore, Rebecca
AU - Borland, Ross
AU - Caruana, Jodie
AU - Cawood, Danyelle
AU - Clarke, Kristina
AU - Emerson, Eric
AU - Evans, Holly
AU - Gray, Kylie M.
AU - Goodall, Stephen
AU - Haas, Kaaren
AU - Henry, Tania
AU - Hinton, Sharon
AU - Hoath, Fiona
AU - Horstead, Sian
AU - Howlin, Patricia
AU - Hu, Nan
AU - Keating, Caroline
AU - Kelly, Eliza
AU - Kotselas, Pauline
AU - Knott, Rachael
AU - Louie, Eva
AU - McAuliffe, Zyra
AU - O’Hagan, Gemma
AU - Ommensen, Berthine
AU - Panahi, Babak
AU - Phillis, Kathryne
AU - Rice, Lauren
AU - Rose, Oriel
AU - Rotolone, Cassandra
AU - Schoch, Martha
AU - Shortt, Fionnuala
AU - Stace, Lucille
AU - Taffe, John
AU - Teague, Samantha
AU - Tellegen, Cassandra
AU - Thompson, Donna-Marie
AU - Viney, Rosalie
AU - Wallman, Emily
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: Parents of children with developmental or intellectual disabilities tend to report greater use of coercive parenting practices relative to parents of typically developing children, increasing the risk of adverse child outcomes. However, to date, there is limited research exploring the role and relative contribution of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors in parents of children with a disability. The present study aimed to explore the role of various modifiable and nonmodifiable parenting, family and sociodemographic factors associated with the use of coercive parenting practices in parents of children with a disability. Methods: Caregivers (N = 1392) enrolled in the Mental Health of Young People with Developmental Disabilities (MHYPeDD) programme in Australia completed a cross-sectional survey about their parenting and their child aged 2–12 years with a disability. Measures covered a range of domains including relevant demographic and family background, use of coercive parenting practices, intensity of child behavioural difficulties and questions relating to parent and family functioning such as parental self-efficacy, adjustment difficulties and quality of family relationships. Results: Parents of older children, those who were younger at the birth of their child, and parents who were co-parenting or working reported more use of coercive parenting practices. Greater intensity of child difficulties, poorer parental self-efficacy and parent–child relationships, and more parental adjustment difficulties were also significantly associated with more use of coercive parenting. Examination of the relative contribution of variables revealed parent–child relationship was a key contributing factor, followed by intensity of child behaviour problems, parent adjustment and parent confidence. Conclusions: These findings highlight a range of factors that should be targeted and modified through upstream prevention programmes and further inform our understanding of how coercive practices may be influenced through targeted parenting interventions.
AB - Background: Parents of children with developmental or intellectual disabilities tend to report greater use of coercive parenting practices relative to parents of typically developing children, increasing the risk of adverse child outcomes. However, to date, there is limited research exploring the role and relative contribution of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors in parents of children with a disability. The present study aimed to explore the role of various modifiable and nonmodifiable parenting, family and sociodemographic factors associated with the use of coercive parenting practices in parents of children with a disability. Methods: Caregivers (N = 1392) enrolled in the Mental Health of Young People with Developmental Disabilities (MHYPeDD) programme in Australia completed a cross-sectional survey about their parenting and their child aged 2–12 years with a disability. Measures covered a range of domains including relevant demographic and family background, use of coercive parenting practices, intensity of child behavioural difficulties and questions relating to parent and family functioning such as parental self-efficacy, adjustment difficulties and quality of family relationships. Results: Parents of older children, those who were younger at the birth of their child, and parents who were co-parenting or working reported more use of coercive parenting practices. Greater intensity of child difficulties, poorer parental self-efficacy and parent–child relationships, and more parental adjustment difficulties were also significantly associated with more use of coercive parenting. Examination of the relative contribution of variables revealed parent–child relationship was a key contributing factor, followed by intensity of child behaviour problems, parent adjustment and parent confidence. Conclusions: These findings highlight a range of factors that should be targeted and modified through upstream prevention programmes and further inform our understanding of how coercive practices may be influenced through targeted parenting interventions.
KW - childhood risk factors
KW - coercive parenting practices
KW - evidence-based parenting programmes
KW - intellectual and developmental disabilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099943791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1016919
U2 - 10.1111/jir.12813
DO - 10.1111/jir.12813
M3 - Article
C2 - 33506597
AN - SCOPUS:85099943791
SN - 0964-2633
VL - 65
SP - 306
EP - 319
JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
IS - 4
ER -