TY - JOUR
T1 - Collaborative population health planning between Australian primary health care organisations and local government
T2 - lost opportunity
AU - Javanparast, Sara
AU - Baum, Frances
AU - Freeman, Toby
AU - Ziersch, Anna
AU - Henderson, Julie
AU - Mackean, Tamara
PY - 2019/2/1
Y1 - 2019/2/1
N2 - Objective: To examine the strength and extent of collaborations between primary health care organisations and local government in population health planning. Methods: Methods included: a) online surveys with Medicare Locals (n=210) and Primary Health Networks (n=66), comparing the two using two-level mixed models; b) interviews with Medicare Local (n=50) and Primary Health Network (n=55) executives; c) interviews with members of local government associations and Primary Health Network board members with local government experience (n=7); and d) review of 54 Medicare Local and 31 Primary Health Network publicly available annual reports. Results: Despite partnership being a policy objective for Medicare Locals/ Primary Health Networks, they reported limited time and financial support for collaboration with local government. Organisational capacity and resources, supportive governance and public health legislation mandating a role for local governments were critical to collaborative planning. Conclusions: Local government has the potential to tackle social factors affecting health; therefore, their inclusion in population health planning is valuable. Legislative mandates would help to achieve this, and PHNs require a stronger Federal Government mandate backed by sufficient resources and a governance structure that supports collaboration. Implications for public health: Improving primary health care and local government collaboration has great potential to improve the quality of health planning and action on social determinants, thus advancing population health and health equity.
AB - Objective: To examine the strength and extent of collaborations between primary health care organisations and local government in population health planning. Methods: Methods included: a) online surveys with Medicare Locals (n=210) and Primary Health Networks (n=66), comparing the two using two-level mixed models; b) interviews with Medicare Local (n=50) and Primary Health Network (n=55) executives; c) interviews with members of local government associations and Primary Health Network board members with local government experience (n=7); and d) review of 54 Medicare Local and 31 Primary Health Network publicly available annual reports. Results: Despite partnership being a policy objective for Medicare Locals/ Primary Health Networks, they reported limited time and financial support for collaboration with local government. Organisational capacity and resources, supportive governance and public health legislation mandating a role for local governments were critical to collaborative planning. Conclusions: Local government has the potential to tackle social factors affecting health; therefore, their inclusion in population health planning is valuable. Legislative mandates would help to achieve this, and PHNs require a stronger Federal Government mandate backed by sufficient resources and a governance structure that supports collaboration. Implications for public health: Improving primary health care and local government collaboration has great potential to improve the quality of health planning and action on social determinants, thus advancing population health and health equity.
KW - collaborative planning
KW - local government
KW - population health
KW - regional PHC organisation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054597134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12834
DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12834
M3 - Article
C2 - 30296822
VL - 43
SP - 68
EP - 74
JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
SN - 1753-6405
IS - 1
ER -