Comment: 'Never mind the similarities, focus on the differences': imposition, imitation and intransigence in post-colonial global policing reform

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter suggests that the imperial contribution of transnational policing to post-colonial policing is often more partial, less effective, and dependent on local power and authority than some 'grand narrative' views of the significance of globalised policing convey or imply. It shows that the Lusophone police influence in recent times has been underestimated by many and that it continues to play a significant role in the increasingly transnational circulations of policing knowledge and practice. The chapter also shows that while it is often associated with a different model of police reform from many others offered by international agencies and other Western countries, there have also been mistakes of a similar kind in the way reforms have been introduced. The very notion that the programs and resources come from dominant Western countries and that they are in some sense imposed on receiving countries conforms neatly with critical understandings of interventionism and past colonial practices.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationColonial Policing and the Transnational Legacy
Subtitle of host publicationThe Global Dynamics of Policing across the Lusophone Community
EditorsConnor O'Reilly
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis
Chapter11
Pages253-264
Number of pages12
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315572734
ISBN (Print)9781409465300
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2017

Keywords

  • transational
  • police reform
  • colonial practices

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comment: 'Never mind the similarities, focus on the differences': imposition, imitation and intransigence in post-colonial global policing reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this