Commentary on: Hahn M, Anslinger K, Eckert M, Fimmers R, Grethe S, Hohoff C, et al. [Joint recommendations of the project group “Biostatistical DNA Calculations” and the Trace Commission on the Biostatistical Evaluation of Forensic DNA Analytical Findings with Fully Continuous Models (FCM)]. Rechtsmedizin (Berl). 2023; 33(1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s00194-022-00599-5

Charles E.H. Berger, Maarten Kruijver, Tacha Hicks, Christophe Champod, Duncan Taylor, John Buckleton

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

    Abstract

    Editor,
    Recently, Hahn et al. published the “Joint recommendations of the project group ‘Biostatistical DNA Calculations’ and the Stain Commission on the Biostatistical Evaluation of Forensic DNA Analytical Findings with Fully Continuous Models (FCM).”

    While the work of the project group and commission to encourage the adoption of FCMs in Germany is to be commended, some of their recommendations are problematic, in our opinion. In this reaction, we will point out a number of issues with their analysis of FCM results and with their recommendations based on that analysis.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)730-735
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
    Volume69
    Issue number2
    Early online date20 Nov 2023
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

    Keywords

    • Probabilistic genotyping
    • Deconvolution
    • Likelihood ratio
    • DNA evidence
    • Forensic biostatistics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on: Hahn M, Anslinger K, Eckert M, Fimmers R, Grethe S, Hohoff C, et al. [Joint recommendations of the project group “Biostatistical DNA Calculations” and the Trace Commission on the Biostatistical Evaluation of Forensic DNA Analytical Findings with Fully Continuous Models (FCM)]. Rechtsmedizin (Berl). 2023; 33(1):3–12. doi: 10.1007/s00194-022-00599-5'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this