Abstract
In Australia, adults (and juveniles) convicted of murder are subject to a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment with a 20-year minimum non-parole period. This sentence is imposed on secondary offenders under doctrines of extended criminal liability, as well as the principal offender. Although a stated justification for mandatory sentences is public confidence, very little is known about public attitudes towards imposing a mandatory life sentence on offenders convicted of murder under extended criminal liability. Using a self-selected sample of the South Australian public and an online vignette survey approach, the study finds, first, that public knowledge of actual murder-related statistics and current sentencing practices is poor. Second, findings indicate that desert-based, or proportional, punishments are often preferred for secondary offenders, rather than the mandatory minima.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Criminology and Criminal Justice |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 17 Jan 2025 |
Keywords
- Extended joint enterprise
- felony murder
- joint enterprise
- life sentences
- mandatory sentencing
- murder
- public opinion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Community sentiment and joint enterprise murder: Challenging the mandatory minimum sentence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver