COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGICAL SKILLS IN THE PRACTICE OF FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY: AN EXAMPLE TO STRESS AN EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL POINT

Elena Varotto, Laura Landini, Andrea Desiderato, Joanna Mietlińska, Luca Sineo, Francesco Maria Galassi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article presents a case of accidental retrieval of osteological remains by the police for which the intervention of specialised diagnostic skills is required in order to efficiently serve the justice system, leading to a correct identification of the examined species. In this instance two fused osteological elements were preliminarily considered by a coroner to be potentially belonging to the human species and could only be determined not to be so – belonging instead to a non-human animal species – by applying comparative osteological methodology. The discussed case also offers relevant insights into the taphonomic alterations caused by the environment in which the remains lay. Finally, a rational education and professional workflow is suggested to optimize diagnostic situations like the one in question.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-149
Number of pages7
JournalAnthropologie
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Comparative anatomy
  • Education
  • Forensic anthropology
  • Justice
  • Osteology
  • Taphonomy
  • Zoology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGICAL SKILLS IN THE PRACTICE OF FORENSIC ANTHROPOLOGY: AN EXAMPLE TO STRESS AN EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL POINT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this