Abstract
This article presents a case of accidental retrieval of osteological remains by the police for which the intervention of specialised diagnostic skills is required in order to efficiently serve the justice system, leading to a correct identification of the examined species. In this instance two fused osteological elements were preliminarily considered by a coroner to be potentially belonging to the human species and could only be determined not to be so – belonging instead to a non-human animal species – by applying comparative osteological methodology. The discussed case also offers relevant insights into the taphonomic alterations caused by the environment in which the remains lay. Finally, a rational education and professional workflow is suggested to optimize diagnostic situations like the one in question.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 143-149 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Anthropologie |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Comparative anatomy
- Education
- Forensic anthropology
- Justice
- Osteology
- Taphonomy
- Zoology