Comparing the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Domestic and International Tertiary Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

University study is a period of psychological vulnerability for many individuals. International college students may be particularly vulnerable to experiencing distress and developing a mental illness due to challenges of relocation and acculturation. The aim of this meta-analytic review was to synthesize the literature on the mental health correlates and outcomes of domestic and international tertiary students. A total of 35 studies were identified via search PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases. Results showed that, among 283,412 participants, very small but non-significant effects were found between domestic and international students on anxiety: r = .04; depression: r =-.01; psychological distress: r =-.01; and wellbeing: r =-.01. Most studies were of relatively poor quality. Among high-quality studies, international students reported fewer symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress than domestic students. On the other hand, domestic students declared higher wellbeing scores on quality-of-life measures. Despite these mixed findings, many students in the included studies reported poor mental health and wellbeing. Further research examining the mental health and wellbeing of domestic and international students is needed, with particular attention to the underlying needs and stressors that affect each subgroup to develop effective supports and countermeasures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)702-740
Number of pages39
JournalJournal of International Students
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • College students
  • mental health
  • meta-analysis
  • systematic review
  • wellbeing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the Mental Health and Wellbeing of Domestic and International Tertiary Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this