TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison between 2-D and 0-D analytical models for slotless double-sided inner armature linear permanent magnet synchronous machines
AU - Ghaffari, Alireza
AU - Rahideh, Akbar
AU - Ghaffari, Hamidreza
AU - Vahaj, Amirabbas
AU - Mahmoudi, Amin
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - This article compares the 2-D and 0-D analytical models for the slotless double-sided inner armature linear permanent magnet synchronous machines (SDSIALPMSMs). The sub-domain method is implemented to achieve the 2-D analytical model. In this method, the cross-section of the motor is divided into eleven sub-regions and the Maxwell equations are determined for each sub-region. In the presented 0-D model, a magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) is derived to compute the maximum magnetic flux density in the air-gap. In both approaches, the magnetic flux density is analytically calculated to predict the inductance, induced voltage, flux linkage and electromagnetic forces. Ultimately, the results of both analytical models are validated against those of the 3-D finite-element method (FEM) analysis. These results confirm the superiority of the 2-D analytical model compared with that of the 0-D in the terms of the accuracy of the magnetic flux density, induced voltage, self and mutual inductances as well as the tangential and normal electromagnetic forces. Also, less computational time of the described 2-D analytical model is recognized as a merit compared with FEM models.
AB - This article compares the 2-D and 0-D analytical models for the slotless double-sided inner armature linear permanent magnet synchronous machines (SDSIALPMSMs). The sub-domain method is implemented to achieve the 2-D analytical model. In this method, the cross-section of the motor is divided into eleven sub-regions and the Maxwell equations are determined for each sub-region. In the presented 0-D model, a magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) is derived to compute the maximum magnetic flux density in the air-gap. In both approaches, the magnetic flux density is analytically calculated to predict the inductance, induced voltage, flux linkage and electromagnetic forces. Ultimately, the results of both analytical models are validated against those of the 3-D finite-element method (FEM) analysis. These results confirm the superiority of the 2-D analytical model compared with that of the 0-D in the terms of the accuracy of the magnetic flux density, induced voltage, self and mutual inductances as well as the tangential and normal electromagnetic forces. Also, less computational time of the described 2-D analytical model is recognized as a merit compared with FEM models.
KW - analytical model
KW - linear PM machine
KW - magnetic equivalent circuit
KW - Maxwell equations
KW - sub-domain method.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087309174&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/2050-7038.12509
DO - 10.1002/2050-7038.12509
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087309174
SN - 2050-7038
VL - 30
JO - International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
JF - International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems
IS - 9
M1 - e12509
ER -