@inproceedings{ddacc0c715b14789aa384f38e952ff7d,
title = "Comparison of stochastic and regression based methods for quantification of predictive uncertainty of model-simulated wellhead protection zones in heterogeneous aquifers",
abstract = "For a synthetic case we computed three types of individual prediction intervals for the location of the aquifer entry point of a particle that moves through a heterogeneous aquifer and ends up in a pumping well. (a) The nonlinear regression-based interval (Cooley, 2004) was found to be nearly accurate and required a few hundred model calls to be computed. (b) The linearized regression-based interval (Cooley, 2004) required just over a hundred model calls and also appeared to be nearly correct, (c) The calibration-constrained Monte Carlo interval (Doherty, 2003) was found to be narrower than the regression-based intervals but required about half a million model calls. It is unclear whether or not this type of prediction interval is accurate.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Computational requirements, Monte Carlo method, Prediction interval, Predictive uncertainty, Regression based method, Wellhead protection zone",
author = "Steen Christensen and Catherine Moore and John Doherty",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
isbn = "1901502589",
series = "IAHS-AISH Publication",
number = "304",
pages = "202--208",
booktitle = "Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling",
edition = "304",
note = "ModelCARE 2005 ; Conference date: 06-06-2005 Through 09-06-2005",
}